12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Firestone Roadhawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
16
10
6
3
5
4
Beste positie
#3
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
6.0
4.7
3.7
2.2
3.3
Laatste test
2023
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
153
109
146
36
63
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Michelin Primacy 4+Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Continental PremiumContact 7Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store