12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Aantal tests
16
10
14
36
Beste positie
#3
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
6.0
3.6
3.1
Laatste test
2023
2026
2025
2023
Beschikbare maten
153
109
194
303

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Droog rijgedrag
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store