Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premie

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Efficient Grip Performance

Kinergy 4S2

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Aantal tests

16

4

6

3

1

Beste positie

#3

#2

#3

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

5.5

5.0

4.7

3.3

1.0

Laatste test

2023

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

153

—

146

40

64

Nat

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droog

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droge behandeling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Inwendig geluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

Kinergy 4S2

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking