Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premie

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Aantal tests

16

18

13

3

1

Beste positie

#3

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

5.5

6.1

6.2

3.7

1.0

Laatste test

2023

2024

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

153

47

530

34

64

Nat

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droog

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droge behandeling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Inwendig geluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

66%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Prijs/waarde

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking