12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Aantal tests
16
18
6
29
Beste positie
#3
#1
#3
#1
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
6.1
4.7
3.7
Laatste test
2023
2024
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
153
47
146
180

Nat

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Droog

Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking