12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
16
6
10
Best position
#3
#6
#2
Average position
5.5
9.8
6.0
Laatste test
2023
2018
2026
Beschikbare maten
153
70
104

Nat

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%

Droog

Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking