12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Aantal tests
16
6
17
3
Beste positie
#3
#3
#1
#4
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
4.7
1.7
4.3
Laatste test
2023
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
153
146
80
99

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Droog rijgedrag
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store