12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
16
1
1
6
4
Beste positie
#3
#7
#1
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
7.0
1.0
4.7
3.3
Laatste test
2023
2023
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
153
88
66
146
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store