12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Aantal tests
16
14
10
36
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
3.6
6.0
3.1
Laatste test
2023
2025
2026
2023
Beschikbare maten
153
194
109
303

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Droog rijgedrag
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store