12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Aantal tests
16
14
29
2
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
3.6
3.7
2.0
Laatste test
2023
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
153
194
180
48

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Droog rijgedrag
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store