12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Vredestein
Quatrac
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
18
16
23
17
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
3.1
3.3
1.7
Laatste test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
88
176
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droog
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Soelaas
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Kosten
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Vredestein Quatrac
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Vredestein Quatrac
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Vredestein Quatrac
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store