12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
18
10
4
17
Beste positie
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
12.2
3.3
1.7
Laatste test
2024
2024
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
207
40
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store