12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
18
10
17
14
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
12.2
1.7
3.6
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
207
80
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Droog
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Soelaas
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store