12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
18
10
14
14
Beste positie
#1
#2
#8
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
12.2
13.4
3.6
Laatste test
2024
2024
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
207
153
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store