12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
18
3
4
2
28
Beste positie
#1
#4
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
4.3
3.3
1.5
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
99
40
66
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store