12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
18
3
49
14
Beste positie
#1
#4
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
4.3
3.2
3.6
Laatste test
2024
2025
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
99
213
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store