12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
18
10
13
4
3
Beste positie
#1
#2
#4
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
6.0
6.3
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
109
116
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store