12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
18
10
23
17
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
6.0
3.3
1.7
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
109
176
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store