12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Aantal tests
18
11
17
49
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
11.6
1.7
3.2
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2024
Beschikbare maten
47
122
80
213

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Droog
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Soelaas
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Kosten
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store