12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
18
11
49
28
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
11.6
3.2
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2024
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
122
213
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store