Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premie

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Aantal tests

18

13

3

4

1

Beste positie

#1

#2

#3

#1

Gemiddelde positie

6.1

6.2

3.3

12.0

1.0

Laatste test

2024

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

47

530

40

111

64

Nat

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droog

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droge behandeling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking