Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof

Premie

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

Turanza T005

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta HS52

Test profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Advantage

WetProof

Aantal tests

18

13

14

Best position

#1

#2

#8

#1

Average position

6.1

6.2

13.4

5.6

Laatste test

2024

2026

2023

Beschikbare maten

47

530

153

47

Nat

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Natte zijgeleiding

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Droog

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Droogremmen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Droge behandeling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Inwendig geluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Nokian WetProof

69%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Rolweerstand

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Prijs/waarde

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Nokian WetProof

46%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
ADAC	De zomer	2023	205/55 R16	Bekijk

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Advantage

WetProof

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Wederzijdse tests

Voeg toe aan vergelijking