12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
18
1
1
6
3
4
Beste positie
#1
#1
#7
#3
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
1.0
7.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2023
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
27
88
146
36
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store