12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
18
16
28
6
3
Beste positie
#1
#3
#1
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
5.5
2.3
4.7
3.7
Laatste test
2024
2023
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
153
67
146
36

Nat

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Droog

Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking