12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
18
25
17
14
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
12.4
1.7
3.6
Laatste test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
55
80
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store