12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
18
21
5
6
28
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#3
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
11.9
2.2
4.7
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
165
63
146
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store