12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
18
21
29
14
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
11.9
3.7
3.6
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
165
180
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store