12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
18
21
49
28
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
11.9
3.2
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2024
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
165
213
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Vergelijk ook

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyFirestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Bladeren op merk

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store