12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Dunlop Winter

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Dunlop
Winter
Aantal tests
18
29
24
2
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
3.7
2.7
1.5
Laatste test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
180
151
66

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Droog
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Soelaas
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Kosten
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store