12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
18
1
10
3
4
Beste positie
#1
#7
#2
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
7.0
6.0
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2023
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
88
109
36
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store