12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
18
1
14
14
4
Beste positie
#1
#7
#2
#8
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
7.0
6.3
13.4
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2023
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
88
532
153
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store