12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
18
1
4
3
1
Beste positie
#1
#7
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
7.0
3.3
3.7
1.0
Laatste test
2024
2023
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
88
40
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store