12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
18
1
14
6
4
Beste positie
#1
#7
#8
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
7.0
13.4
4.7
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2023
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
88
153
146
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store