12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
18
3
3
14
Beste positie
#1
#1
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
1.3
4.3
3.6
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
23
99
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store