12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Aantal tests
18
28
14
5
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
2.3
3.6
4.4
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
68
194
99

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store