12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
18
26
6
1
Beste positie
#1
#1
#3
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
4.2
4.7
1.0
Laatste test
2024
2024
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
100
146
66

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental AllSeasonContact
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental AllSeasonContact
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental AllSeasonContact
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental AllSeasonContact
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store