12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Aantal tests
18
14
10
14
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#8
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
3.6
12.2
13.4
Laatste test
2024
2025
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
194
207
153

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store