12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
18
14
5
28
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
3.6
4.4
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
194
99
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Droog
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store