12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
18
14
14
28
Beste positie
#1
#1
#8
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
3.6
13.4
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
47
194
153
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store