12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Aantal tests
18
14
29
3
Beste positie
#1
#8
#1
#4
Gemiddelde positie
6.1
13.4
3.7
4.3
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
47
153
180
99

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Natte zijgeleiding
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Droge stuurrespons
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Prijs/waarde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store