Vergelijking: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Solmax 1

ION Evo

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

1

13

3

1

3

Best position

#8

#1

#2

#7

#2

Average position

8.0

1.0

4.3

3.7

7.0

3.3

Laatste test

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

46

64

123

34

—

40

Nat

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kosten

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolweerstand

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometrage

Goodride Solmax 1

45%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Droog

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droogremmen

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge behandeling

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Soelaas

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Soelaas

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Buitengeluid

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Solmax 1

ION Evo

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Nat

Kosten

Droog

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking