Vergelijking: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

VS

Also compare with

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Solmax 1

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

BluEarth-XT

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

1

26

1

6

3

Best position

#8

#1

#7

#3

#2

Average position

8.0

1.0

2.2

7.0

4.7

3.3

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

46

64

66

—

146

40

Nat

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kosten

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolweerstand

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometrage

Goodride Solmax 1

45%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Prijs/waarde

Goodride Solmax 1

96%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Soelaas

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Soelaas

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Buitengeluid

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Droog

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droogremmen

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge behandeling

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Solmax 1

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

BluEarth-XT

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Nat

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking