12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: General Tire Grabber GT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

General
Tire Grabber GT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
3
3
3
Beste positie
#9
#2
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
9.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2017
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
1
40
60
34

Nat

Nat
General Tire Grabber GT
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
General Tire Grabber GT
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
General Tire Grabber GT
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
General Tire Grabber GT
46%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
General Tire Grabber GT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
General Tire Grabber GT
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Kosten

Kosten
General Tire Grabber GT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
General Tire Grabber GT
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
General Tire Grabber GT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
General Tire Grabber GT
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Droog

Droog
General Tire Grabber GT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking