12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
6
10
3
Beste positie
#6
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
9.8
6.0
3.3
Laatste test
2018
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
70
104
40

Nat

Nat
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Kosten

Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometrage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Droog

Droog
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droge behandeling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking