12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Aantal tests
6
10
18
Beste positie
#6
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
9.8
6.0
6.1
Laatste test
2018
2026
2024
Beschikbare maten
70
104
47

Nat

Nat
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Kosten

Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kilometrage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Prijs/waarde
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Rolweerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Droog

Droog
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Droge behandeling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Buitengeluid
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking