12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofiel

Fulda
EcoControl HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Aantal tests
6
3
15
Beste positie
#6
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
9.8
3.3
9.0
Laatste test
2018
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
70
40
225

Nat

Nat
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kilometrage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Prijs/waarde
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rolweerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Buitengeluid
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Droog

Droog
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Droge behandeling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking