12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofiel

Fulda
EcoControl HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
6
3
10
Beste positie
#6
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
9.8
3.3
6.0
Laatste test
2018
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
70
40
104

Nat

Nat
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolweerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometrage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Droog

Droog
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Droge behandeling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Buitengeluid
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking