12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofiel

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Aantal tests
6
18
15
Beste positie
#6
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
9.8
6.1
9.0
Laatste test
2018
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
70
47
225

Nat

Nat
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kilometrage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Prijs/waarde
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rolweerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Buitengeluid
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Droog

Droog
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Droge behandeling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking