12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofiel

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
6
18
10
Beste positie
#6
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
9.8
6.1
6.0
Laatste test
2018
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
70
47
104

Nat

Nat
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Prijs/waarde
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Rolweerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometrage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Buitengeluid
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Droog

Droog
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Droge behandeling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking