12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Aantal tests
6
18
14
Best position
#6
#1
#8
Average position
9.8
6.1
13.4
Laatste test
2018
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
70
47
153

Nat

Nat
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Kosten

Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Prijs/waarde
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Rolweerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometrage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Droog

Droog
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Droge behandeling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Buitengeluid
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking